CRAN Package Check Results for Package noncompliance

Last updated on 2018-05-14 01:46:50 CEST.

Flavor Version Tinstall Tcheck Ttotal Status Flags
r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang 0.2.2 18.40 46.61 65.01 NOTE
r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc 0.2.2 13.71 41.02 54.73 NOTE
r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang 0.2.2 89.11 NOTE
r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-gcc 0.2.2 84.79 NOTE
r-devel-windows-ix86+x86_64 0.2.2 39.00 135.00 174.00 OK
r-patched-linux-x86_64 0.2.2 19.55 50.92 70.47 NOTE
r-patched-solaris-x86 0.2.2 107.60 OK
r-release-linux-x86_64 0.2.2 17.55 50.78 68.33 NOTE
r-release-windows-ix86+x86_64 0.2.2 39.00 135.00 174.00 OK
r-release-osx-x86_64 0.2.2 OK
r-oldrel-windows-ix86+x86_64 0.2.2 41.00 111.00 152.00 OK
r-oldrel-osx-x86_64 0.2.2 OK

Check Details

Version: 0.2.2
Check: compiled code
Result: NOTE
    File ‘noncompliance/libs/noncompliance.so’:
     Found no calls to: ‘R_registerRoutines’, ‘R_useDynamicSymbols’
    
    It is good practice to register native routines and to disable symbol
    search.
    
    See ‘Writing portable packages’ in the ‘Writing R Extensions’ manual.
Flavors: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang, r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc, r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang, r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-gcc, r-patched-linux-x86_64, r-release-linux-x86_64